A California school district is coming under fire for a homosexual website being funded with taxpayer dollars.
In the News
-
May 4th, 2009
-
May 4th, 2009
The leader of a pro-family organization says families across the nation need to contact their U.S. senators now to try to derail a legislative plan that already has passed the U.S. House and is being awaited by President Obama ? after a Democrat confirmed that it would protect "all 547 forms of sexual deviancy or 'paraphilias' listed by the American Psychiatric Association."
-
May 4th, 2009
A court in Dubai has found a woman who lost her unborn child in a traffic accident guilty of manslaughter in what is said to be an unprecedented ruling.
-
May 4th, 2009
If the trend of homosexual marriage is going to be reversed, the reversal must begin with a powerful, Spirit-filled, and spirited defense of marriage from the churches. Christian pastors, teachers, and other church leaders need to find their prophetic voice, speaking the truth in love to a generation that is on the verge of embracing a lie.
-
May 4th, 2009
Early onset of sexual activity among teens may relate to the amount of adult content children were exposed to during their childhood, according to a new study released by Children's Hospital Boston.
-
May 3rd, 2009
Suspicion that move to up-date Defamation Act is an attempt by desperate government to divert voters? attention.
-
May 3rd, 2009
Campaigners seek to block legislation carrying hefty fines for blasphemy.
-
May 3rd, 2009
A controversial Australian doctor who backs euthanasia was allowed into the UK yesterday after an interview at Heathrow airport, his lawyer said.
-
May 3rd, 2009
Replacing the objective standard of one man-one woman to define a marriage with the subjective qualification of "loving relationship" opens the door to anyone who makes that claim. The end result will be utter moral chaos.
-
May 3rd, 2009
Why is being opposed to changing the states' legal definition of marriage considered to be "hateful?" Especially when the underlying philosophical and historical stance of those opposed to changing the definition is more complete and sophisticated than the primitive equality argument of supporters?