Skip to content

Archive site notice

You are viewing an archived copy of Christian Concern's website. Some features are disabled and pages may not display properly.

To view our current site, please visit

Government challenged to act on sharia law

Printer-friendly version

The government was challenged last week to “make it a priority to respond urgently” to the findings of the independent review of the application of sharia law in England and Wales, published in February.

Discriminatory practices

The review stated that “no one disputed that sharia councils engage in practices which are discriminatory to women.”

Baroness Cox questioned the government’s response in the House of Lords. In her reply to the government she cited an example:

One Muslim lady told me, “I feel betrayed by Britain. I came here to get away from this, and it’s worse here than in the country from which I came”. Therefore, I ask the Minister whether Her Majesty’s Government will make it a priority to respond urgently with appropriate legislation, because many Muslim women are suffering in this country in ways which would make our suffragettes turn in their graves.


Women pressured

Baroness Donaghay highlighted the issue of Muslim women being pressured to resolve issues in sharia councils:

There are now widespread concerns regarding the nature of consent given prior to sharia council hearings. Women may be pressured by their families into going to these councils and may lack knowledge of both the English language and their rights under English law. Does the Minister agree that this is an issue of equal rights for women? May I press her on how the Government will ensure the rights of Muslim women and ensure that the rule of law is upheld?

Lord Elton also spoke in this vein:

In assessing the scale of this problem, do Her Majesty’s Government take into account the, I believe, considerable number of people living in closed communities who are under severe pressure, social and otherwise, not to tarnish a family’s ​honour by going to British law and who may not even speak the English language? They are not likely to show on the radar or to give evidence to inquiries. This problem seems to me bigger and more urgent than Her Majesty’s Government are giving it credit for.


Registration of marriages would help

Baroness Cox has a Private Members’ Bill going through the House of Lords that would require all religious marriages to be legally registered. As she said, this would:

… require all religious marriages to be legally registered, thereby eradicating the vulnerability of Muslim women in the application of sharia law in this country, whereby a man can divorce his wife merely by saying “I divorce you” three times, and there is widespread polygamy, causing great unhappiness. 

The independent review also proposed that requiring registration of religious marriages would help to prevent polygamy and discriminatory divorces.

A Channel 4 documentary last year highlighted that many Muslim women are unaware that their Islamic marriages are not legally recognised, which means that they have no legal protection if their husband dies or the marriage breaks down. A survey found that 78% of Muslim women wanted their Muslim marriage to be recognised under British law.

Christian Concern has supported Baroness Cox’s Private Member’s Bill to require registration of religious marriages. We hope that the government acts swiftly to protect women’s rights in this way.



Hansard transcript of the debate.

Christian Concern: “Sharia councils discriminating against women” – commentary on the independent review into the application of sharia law.

Christian Concern: “The Truth About Muslim Marriage” Commentary on the Channel 4 documentary.

Christian Concern: “Marriage registration amendment is ‘much needed’”